Official Candidates

Looks Aren't Everything

The Parties

Party Logos

The Issues

Columns

Commentary

News

Gossip

Interviews

Writers' Profiles

Political Basics

Political History

Quotes

2000 Political Links

Campaign Buttons

Website Reviews

Harold Stassen Award

Coming Attractions

About DH2K

Investor Queries

Team Opportunities

Writers' Guidelines

Contact

 

 

 

THE PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTION
Jack Curtin

Call it blatant chauvinism, but I suspect that the influence of my native state, the lovely and talented Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, might turn out to be as significant in the presidential election this year as that of any state in the union, and not just because the Republican National Convention will be held in Philadelphia in July, or even because of our always hotly-contested 23 electoral votes.

The real reason? Consider the roles in our national drama which are being played by three prominent Pennsylvanians.

1. Edward G. Rendell, former Mayor of Philadelphia, current Democratic National Committee Chairman. Named to the top DNC post on September 29, 1999 as President Clinton's personal choice, Rendell is an aggressive fund raiser and articulate spokesman for his party. Granted, how long he will be able to maintain his affability ("Republicans are good people") remains to be seen. In eight years as Mayor of the City of Brotherly Love, he achieved such an impressive improvement in the city's fortunes that the effort was dubbed "one of the most stunning turnarounds in recent urban history" by the New York Times and he earned the sobriquet "America's Mayor." Rendell has his eye on the Pennsylvania Governor's mansion and is considered one of the rare candidates from Philadelphia (most of the rural population which is spread across the rest of the state considers the city a locale just this side of Sodom and Gomorra) who might have a chance of winning it. It should be noted, however, that rumors have it that some of the Gore folks are not entirely happy with a Clinton selectee in the top job and may move to make a change. Sounds like a dumb move (which probably makes it all the more likely, given the Gore Campaign's record to date).

2. Governor Tom Ridge. The man who holds the job that Rendell wants is considered by many an ideal choice as running mate for Texas Governor George W. Bush, topped in the ticket-enhancing department only by unlikely candidates Colin Powell and John McCain. Ridge's second term will be up in 2002 and he can't succeed himself, so a nice new job in Washington would suit him just fine. Indeed, his operatives have been hard at work positioning him as the right choice ever since Bush announced his own candidacy. The two men are friendly, which helps, but beyond that, Ridge would bring major benefits to the ticket: as a popular incumbent, he could help the GOP win a valuable swing state; as a Catholic (albeit a pro-choice moderate one), he could help offset the Bob Jones factor; as a decorated Vietnam War veteran, one who actually saw combat, he'd counter-balance Bush' s National Guard past and more than match Gore's war experiences. The downside? Certainly that there pro-choice thing, which still may incite the rabid right (despite its current gritted-teeth, low-profile demeanor). Worse yet, perhaps, Ridge is a big, solid 6-foot-3, towering over the 5" 11" Texas Guv. No candidate wants to look puny next to his running mate.

3. Senator Arlen Specter. Darlin' Arlen, forever famous as the man who came up with the Warren Commission's hard-to-swallow "single bullet" theory, heads up a Senate Task Force which is charged with looking into a wide range of purported Clinton Administration scandals, from campaign finance violations in 1996 to Chinese espionage cases more recently to possible gummint screwups in the Waco mess back in 1993. He's been a particularly vocal critic of the Justice Department under Janet Reno and is already making noises about the Elian Gonzales situation, joining a chorus of fellow GOPers anxious for yet another crack at the current resident of the White House and eager to sidetrack the man whose election would validate the incumbent's record. He could be in position to release some potentially harmful investigative reports come next November and thus influence the election if the Gore-Bush race is as close as many pundits predict. Specter is getting attacked by Democrats for partisanship and even by some members of his own party for over-zealousness, but the former Philadelphia DA is a stubborn cuss unlikely to be swayed by the opinions of his peers. This is, after all, a liberal Jewish Senator from the Northeast who had no qualms about running in the 1996 GOP primaries.

 


 

CONFUSED BY ALL THE POLITICAL RHETORIC?
CAN'T DECIDE WHO TO VOTE FOR?


CLICK THE DARKHORSE FOR A BETTER WAY TO CHOOSE


Copyright © 2000
DarkHorse2000
All rights reserved
All wrongs righted