|

Official
Candidates
Looks
Aren't Everything
The Parties
Party
Logos
The
Issues

Columns
Commentary
News
Gossip
Interviews
Writers'
Profiles

Political
Basics
Political
History
Quotes
2000
Political Links

Campaign
Buttons
Website
Reviews
Harold
Stassen Award
Coming
Attractions

About
DH2K
Investor
Queries
Team
Opportunities
Writers'
Guidelines
Contact

|
"The
Expansionist Party of the United States ("XP") is a small,
international organization founded over the telephone February
19, 1977 by two gay men in two different boros of New York
City. It works, sometimes in conjunction with other statehood
organizations, to enlarge the United States geographically.
Alas, in that we are a voluntary organization with no independent
income, the Party gets only such time as its Chairman, L.
Craig Schoonmaker, and other members can devote after their
regular occupations. Lack of wealth also prevents the Party
from running candidates for elective office at this time,
save by write-in campaign. The bulk of the Party's work
is in educating the public, by means of letters to the editor,
the Internet, occasional radio and TV appearances, speeches
at colleges, etc., and in urging government officials to
adopt XP policies."
Today
Puerto Rico, tomorrow Saskatchewan . . .
This
charming exercise in political idealism is dedicated to
expanding the boundaries of the United States. Self-described
as radical centrist and radical pragmatist, they are "a
general-purpose political organization of the radical
center dedicated to geographic enlargement of the United
States, ultimately to culminate in world union under the
Constitution". They would like to see Canada and
Great Britain, and ultimately the rest of the world join
in the union of the United States. It's not about power
though, it's about mutual aid and assistance. Since America
is a very wealthy country, they feel it has an obligation
to unite with and help less fortunate countries.
The
Expansionist Party actually has some pretty good ideas.
Take their solution to the Kosovo problem, for example:
"The U.S. has no right to make laws for people outside
our Union. If we wish to make laws for Serbia, we will have
to make Serbia a state, admit two Serb Senators and seventeen
Representatives, then listen respectfully as Serbs explain
why they must defend themselves against guerrilla onslaught
by Albanians. And it will then be American soldiers, policemen,
mayors, etc., that the Kosovo "Liberation" Army is murdering.
Our motto here, and in every other civil war around the
world in which we are asked to intervene, must be "No domination
without representation." So unless you are for "Kosovo,
USA", you should pressure the U.S. Government to get out
of Kosovo and stay out."
OFFICIAL
PLATFORM STATEMENT
FROM THE OFFICIAL WEB PAGE
"We
can start by ending the scandal of colonialism at the
end of the 20th Century. The United States, which started
the entire modern process of decolonization by throwing
off the British yoke in 1776, itself has colonies! Shocking
but true. We must end our own colonialism as our first
priority, by (a) granting statehood, (b) merging small
colonies into larger new or existing states, or (c) granting
independence".
"XP
proposes that our two Caribbean colonies, Puerto Rico
and the U.S. Virgin Islands, be merged into a single 51st
State. There is a sizable statehood movement in Puerto
Rico, but it has refused to demand the one thing that
will bring Puerto Rico into the Union quickly: that Congress
unilaterally terminate PR's neither/nor "Commonwealth"
status (neither full equality with the 50 States as a
State of the Union nor equality among the nations of the
world as an independent country) and force Puerto Ricans
to choose between the only two permanent statuses available
to them: statehood or independence - fish or cut bait!"
"The
United States has three colonies in the Pacific Ocean:
Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, all of which are very small. Even put
together, these three colonies would not be large enough
to warrant admission as a State of the Union, for it would
be unfair for their 250,000 people to have as much representation
in the Senate as California's 32 million. The only way
they could become fully participating citizens of the
United States, then, is for their three tiny territories
to be merged into the State of Hawaii - the "Big Hawaii"
proposal made over 30 years ago by prominent Hawaiians."
"Once
we have resolved, to statehood or independence, the status
of our colonies, we should look to bring into the Union
areas that are compatible in language (English Canada,
Britain, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and the English-speaking
areas of the Caribbean); then culture, trade, and history
(Quebec, Mexico, Haiti and other non-English-speaking
areas of the Caribbean, the Philippines, Latin America,
Europe, and Japan); and then areas less like us (the rest
of the planet). Rich areas would subsidize poor - and,
happily, make money by supplying electrification, roads,
schools, hospitals, housing, and other infrastructure;
textbooks, medicines, and the panoply of other goods and
services the people of poor areas need! Poor areas need
what rich areas make, but they can't afford to buy it
as long as they remain apart. Join them together and the
one hand washes the other, money flows from the right
hand to the left - and back again".
"With
such a system, the United States could absorb the entire
remainder of planet Earth without risking the wealth and
lifestyle of present-day Americans. All the world would,
in a unified Congress, split on matters of principle.
New members would not conspire among themselves to victimize
their fellow citizens of the now-minority old-American
population. Leftist-inclined representatives would align
with their fellow leftists, across geographical boundaries.
And to the extent geography did play a role in controlling
people's votes, Uttar Pradesh would balance Szechwan;
France would balance Germany; South Africa would balance
the Congo. And we would all find a way to work together
for everybody's common interest".
THE
DARKHORSE2000 FISHY-EYED ASSESSMENT 
It's
not a likely scenario, kiddos, but it's a nice dream. Never
give up on your dreams.
-
RA
Editor's Note:
L. Craig Schoonmaker, Party Chairman and write-in
presidential candidate contacted us and told us he felt we
were a little harsh in our assessment of the Expansionist
Party. We reconsidered and decided that he's right. Their
platform may be idealistic, but a world without idealists
and dreamers would be a pretty sad place.
Here are some of his comments:
"We find it odd for a website that
wants to promote independent evaluation by voters of the
various messages and candidates available to them, to itself
naysay our program as a pointless dream. Nothing people
choose to ignore or try will ever happen; but that which
many people decide to try may actually happen. That's
the hope on which third parties are based".
"Try to be positive,
not negative. There are too many people accepting too much
that they could change if only they tried".
CONFUSED
BY ALL THE POLITICAL RHETORIC?
CAN'T DECIDE WHO TO VOTE FOR?
CLICK THE
DARKHORSE FOR A BETTER WAY TO CHOOSE
Copyright
© 2000
DarkHorse2000
All rights reserved
All wrongs righted
|
|