Become a Member

Run for President

DarkHorse Poll

Discussion Groups

Official Candidates

Looks Aren't Everything

The Parties

Party Logos

The Issues

DarkHorse2000 Candidates

Columns

Commentary

News

Gossip

Interviews

Writers' Profiles

Campaign Buttons

Website Reviews

Harold Stassen Award

Collectors' Corner

Political Basics

Political History

Quotes

2000 Political Links

Coming Attractions

About DH2K

Investor Queries

Team Opportunities

Writers' Guidelines

Contact

PARTY OVERVIEW

As its name implies, the U.S. Pacifist Party is vehemently anti-military, anti-agression. The party has a series of broad-spectrum oppositions to military power and traditions and presents arguments from philisophical, religious and pragmatic perspectives to support its agenda. Human rights and eradication of "major social evils" such as poverty, war and political oppression, are also high on the party agenda.

The party's candidate for president, is Bradford Lyttle, a Quaker and lifelong anti-war activist with rather impressive academic and activist credentials dating back to the early 1960's. Unlike some of the more strident left-wing candidates, Lyttle, at the age of 72, comes off as a thoughtful, compassionate soul whose prime goal is the wellbeing of the human race.

The U.S. Pacifist Party appears radical in thought, reasonable in tone. Despite the occasional reference to Divine revelation as a source of inspiration, they do not appear to be defining "divine" beyond the boundaries of personal conscience and there is a realistic attempt to express even the more esoteric aspects of philosophy within a framework of political scientific theory. Their goal is "to give expression within a democratic, electoral context to the belief that military power profoundly contradicts many religious and philosophic principles and is a practical mistake in our time." Note the use of the word "practical"- these folks genuinely believe that military actions and institutions are not economically, socially or politically expedient in today's world and are ready to back this argument with some thoughtful dialogue. In other respects, the party takes a pretty standard, hard left approach in their platform: they are anti-gun, pro-abortion, oppose the logging industry and the death penalty. No surprises on their (extensive) agenda.

 

OFFICIAL PLATFORM STATEMENT
FROM THE OFFICIAL WEB PAGE

Zero military budget;

Deactivation of all nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons;

Elimination of the Strategic Defense Initiative;

Abolition of all aspects of the Selective Service System;

Complete disarmament, through negotiations and unilateral actions;

An end to all overt and covert military aid and intelligence operations;

Massive aid to abolish hunger, poverty, and ignorance at home and worldwide. The aid would be administered by the United Nations;

Preparation for nonviolent resistance against possible invasion and occupation attempts;

Establishment of an unarmed service corps trained in strategic nonviolent defense and equipped for mobilization anywhere in the world. This "Mercy Force" might be a new branch of the Department of Defense or the centerpiece of a new Department of Nonviolent Action;

Establishment of a Multinational Humanitarian Alliance to carry out a wide range of Mercy Force missions including nonviolent defense training, peacekeeping efforts, nonviolent intervention, disaster relief and rescue operations, and constructive social and ecological projects;

Internationalization of nuclear and fusion energy. Shut-down of plutonium creating reactors until all nuclear weapons and weapons manufacturing facilities have been deactivated, and a democratic world government can appraise nuclear technology in terms of global interests. Promotion of solar, wind, oceanic temperature gradient, and other sources of low pollution energy;

Full employment through revitalized private enterprises, including cooperatives, and worker- controlled and managed industries, and federally administered public projects. The USPP recognizes that most violence is the defensive behavior of those protecting property and privilege, in societies and a world in which the loss of dominance and advantages means poverty, degradation, oppression and exploitation. Where society is divided by different social relations to the means of production, distribution and allocation of goods and services, basic social inequality follows. Having, belonging, and controlling characterize certain social strata, while dependency, passivity, insecurity and propertylessness characterize others. To reduce the likelihood of war, the dominant economic institutions of world society should be democratically controlled. This implies a high degree of worker control, a vigorous cooperative movement, and the creation of a democratic world polity;

Termination of all foreign military aid immediately. Humanitarian foreign aid would be directed toward helping the poor meet their basic human needs and become more self-sufficient. Aid to foreign governments would be contingent upon exemplary human rights records. When that is not the case, any aid given would be distributed by trustworthy agencies;

Support for legitimate, nonviolent social change movements that are struggling to advance human rights and political freedom;

Creation of a Canadian-style single-payer national health care system with universal access, comprehensive coverage, and freedom of choice in the selection of doctors, medical facilities, and methods of treatment;

Reduction of inflation toward zero;

A guaranteed minimum income for U.S. citizens through the establishment of a negative income tax;

Establishment of a voluntary national service program for college students and the unemployed;

Extensive reduction of federal taxes. This would be made possible primarily through the elimination of the military budget;

Opposition to all forms of racial, sexual and religious discrimination, and all unjust socio-economic barriers;

Abolition of the death penalty;

Ending of the "war on drugs." The war on drugs is an infringement of the right of individual liberty. Drug abuse would be treated as a health problem rather than a crime. Most illicit drugs would be relegalized, and taxed to pay for drug abuse prevention and treatment programs. As poverty and social injustice in the U.S. was eliminated, the use of drugs could be expected to drastically decline; Protection of nonsmokers' right to breathe clean air;

Enforcement of tough laws against driving under the influence of alcohol or other drugs;

Limitation of agricultural subsidies to environmentally sustainable farming practices;

Promotion of steady-state economic principles to develop an environmentally sustainable economy;

Legislation to end logging, grazing, and oil drilling on public lands;

Ending of subsidies for nuclear energy and fossil fuels.

Placing of pollution taxes on fossil fuels and nuclear power. Use of the resulting revenues to fund research and development of renewable energy sources, with particular emphasis on solar-hydrogen energy. Natural gas might serve as a transitional fuel source;

Placing of appropriate pollution taxes on other industries to fund environmental protection programs;

Ban on the manufacture, sale, and possession of handguns.

Illegalization of assault weapons;

Support for the right to obtain a safe and legal abortion;

Support for family planning programs and international efforts to control population growth;

Support for a constitutional amendment banning discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation;

Opposition to any restrictions on the right to freedom of travel and migration across U.S. borders;

Normalization of relations with Cuba.

Repeal of the Helms-Burton Act, that permits lawsuits against individuals and firms who make use of land and facilities in Cuba that were nationalized by the Cuban government;

Ending of the travel ban and blanket economic sanctions against Iraq.

Inauguration of a large-scale aid program to overcome the malnutrition and disease, especially among children, that the sanctions have caused;

Support for one-person-one-vote democratic world government.

Creation of an open party list or mixed member system of proportional representation for electing the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate;

Elimination of the electoral college. Carrying out of presidential elections by national majority preference voting;

Creation of a national initiative and referendum system;

Limitation of campaign spending. Establishment of fair and open ballot access laws.

Establishment of public campaign financing, and provision of equal access to public television and radio for all ballot- certified candidates;

Requirement that savings and loans industries, and the nuclear industry, provide their own insurance;

Encouragement of intercommunication, and the free flow of information between all peoples;

Respect for cultural diversity.

 

THE DARKHORSE2000 FISHY-EYED ASSESSMENT

The party of choice for anti-war activists who want clean air, massive social programs, safety in the streets and a cuddly, user-friendly government. Sounds appealing and they are doing a pretty good job of phrasing the standard left-wing radical agenda in a sane and cogent manner. The downside of this is that they are so politically correct in every aspect (and they seem to have thought of everything) that it doesn't seem possible that anyone, including their presidential candidate could be that perfect. Mister Rogers meets Tom Hayden.

And that Divine revelation business makes us a bit nervous - we half expected to see pastel drawings of New Age angels turning guns into plowshares adorning their web page. These folks are obviously sincere but they're preaching to the choir - their extensive agenda isn't going to win them many new converts from the opposing side or the middle ground. They're going to be relegated to innocent bystander status in any major election

- JS


 

Copyright © 2000
DarkHorse2000
All rights reserved